[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [SeaBIOS] What's the impact of enlarging IDE_TIMEOUT ?
From: |
Kevin O'Connor |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [SeaBIOS] What's the impact of enlarging IDE_TIMEOUT ? |
Date: |
Sat, 1 Jun 2013 09:21:43 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 03:18:56AM +0000, Gonglei (Arei) wrote:
> IDE_TIMEOUT is defined 32s. But we encountered its timeout in
> some cases, and then loading disk failed in VM. In order to
> reduce the probability of timeout, we want to enlarge the
> IDE_TIMEOUT, such as 120s. We verified this modification worked
> for us. But we are wondering if this modification may cause other
> potential issues. Why set IDE_TIMEOUT to 32s? Thanks!
The ATA specification specifies the maximum response time for many
commands to be 30 seconds. The extra 2 seconds were thrown in for
safety.
-Kevin
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [SeaBIOS] What's the impact of enlarging IDE_TIMEOUT ?,
Kevin O'Connor <=