Re: [Qemu-devel] updated: kvm networking todo wiki

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 05:41:11PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 05/23/2013 04:50 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Hey guys,
> > I've updated the kvm networking todo wiki with current projects.
> > Will try to keep it up to date more often.
> > Original announcement below.
> 
> Thanks a lot. I've added the tasks I'm currently working on to the wiki.
> 
> btw. I notice the virtio-net data plane were missed in the wiki. Is the
> project still being considered?

It might have been interesting several years ago, but now that linux has
vhost-net in kernel, the only point seems to be to
speed up networking on non-linux hosts. Since non-linux
does not have kvm, I doubt virtio is a bottleneck.
IMO yet another networking backend is a distraction,
and confusing to users.
In any case, I'd like to see virtio-blk dataplane replace
non dataplane first. We don't want two copies of
virtio-net in qemu.

> > ----
> >
> > I've put up a wiki page with a kvm networking todo list,
> > mainly to avoid effort duplication, but also in the hope
> > to draw attention to what I think we should try addressing
> > in KVM:
> >
> > http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/NetworkingTodo
> >
> > This page could cover all networking related activity in KVM,
> > currently most info is related to virtio-net.
> >
> > Note: if there's no developer listed for an item,
> > this just means I don't know of anyone actively working
> > on an issue at the moment, not that no one intends to.
> >
> > I would appreciate it if others working on one of the items on this list
> > would add their names so we can communicate better.  If others like this
> > wiki page, please go ahead and add stuff you are working on if any.
> >
> > It would be especially nice to add autotest projects:
> > there is just a short test matrix and a catch-all
> > 'Cover test matrix with autotest', currently.
> >
> > Currently there are some links to Red Hat bugzilla entries,
> > feel free to add links to other bugzillas.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >