[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Proposal for hw/ split
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Proposal for hw/ split |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Mar 2013 08:33:53 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130219 Thunderbird/17.0.3 |
Il 12/03/2013 07:48, Richard Henderson ha scritto:
> On 2013-03-11 04:17, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> == hw/pci ==
>> hw/alpha_typhoon.c hw/pci/host-typhoon.c
>
> Why wouldn't this go into hw/alpha/, really?
Sure. I think the Alpha-specific interrupt delivery parts should be
separated into hw/alpha, like hw/cris/pic_cpu.c, and passed to the
device via GPIO pins. And after doing some parts could go in hw/pci and
others could go in hw/intc. The emulation is quite shallow, so I
couldn't really find a place for it.
Peter said he wants few or no devices in hw/arm/, so I proceeded in that
direction, but cases like this are when I'm totally okay with giving
maintainers all the leeway they want. I'll move this one back to hw/alpha/.
Paolo
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Proposal for hw/ split, (continued)
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Proposal for hw/ split, Edgar E. Iglesias, 2013/03/11
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Proposal for hw/ split, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2013/03/11
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Proposal for hw/ split, Richard Henderson, 2013/03/12
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Proposal for hw/ split,
Paolo Bonzini <=