qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH uq/master 2/2] kvm: forward INIT signals coming


From: Gleb Natapov
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH uq/master 2/2] kvm: forward INIT signals coming from the chipset
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 13:54:39 +0200

On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 07:48:50AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> CPU_INTERRUPT_INIT can also be generated if you have an internal APIC,
> since the keyboard controller and the southbridge can also pulse the
> CPU's INIT# pin.
> 
> Exit the VCPU is one is received, and process it by changing the
> mp_state to KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
> ---
>  target-i386/kvm.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target-i386/kvm.c b/target-i386/kvm.c
> index 0cf413d..56de77c 100644
> --- a/target-i386/kvm.c
> +++ b/target-i386/kvm.c
> @@ -1772,14 +1772,15 @@ void kvm_arch_pre_run(CPUState *cpu, struct kvm_run 
> *run)
>          }
>      }
>  
> -    if (!kvm_irqchip_in_kernel()) {
> -        /* Force the VCPU out of its inner loop to process any INIT requests
> -         * or pending TPR access reports. */
> -        if (env->interrupt_request &
> -            (CPU_INTERRUPT_INIT | CPU_INTERRUPT_TPR)) {
> -            cpu->exit_request = 1;
> -        }
> +    /* Force the VCPU out of its inner loop to process any INIT requests
> +     * or (for userspace APIC, but it is cheap to combine the checks here)
> +     * pending TPR access reports.
> +     */
> +    if (env->interrupt_request & (CPU_INTERRUPT_INIT | CPU_INTERRUPT_TPR)) {
> +        cpu->exit_request = 1;
> +    }
>  
> +    if (!kvm_irqchip_in_kernel()) {
>          /* Try to inject an interrupt if the guest can accept it */
>          if (run->ready_for_interrupt_injection &&
>              (env->interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD) &&
> @@ -1835,6 +1836,7 @@ int kvm_arch_process_async_events(CPUState *cs)
>  {
>      X86CPU *cpu = X86_CPU(cs);
>      CPUX86State *env = &cpu->env;
> +    int ret;
>  
>      if (env->interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_MCE) {
>          /* We must not raise CPU_INTERRUPT_MCE if it's not supported. */
> @@ -1859,6 +1861,20 @@ int kvm_arch_process_async_events(CPUState *cs)
>          }
>      }
>  
> +    if (env->interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_INIT) {
> +        kvm_cpu_synchronize_state(env);
> +        if (kvm_irqchip_in_kernel()) {
> +            env->mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED;
> +            env->interrupt_request = 0;
> +            ret = kvm_put_mp_state(cpu);
> +            if (ret < 0) {
> +                return ret;
> +            }
> +        } else {
> +            do_cpu_init(cpu);
> +        }
> +    }
> +
Why not move INIT case from below as is? Vcpu is reset to correct sate
by QEMU just like during system_reset.

>      if (kvm_irqchip_in_kernel()) {
>          return 0;
>      }
> @@ -1872,10 +1888,6 @@ int kvm_arch_process_async_events(CPUState *cs)
>          (env->interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_NMI)) {
>          env->halted = 0;
>      }
> -    if (env->interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_INIT) {
> -        kvm_cpu_synchronize_state(env);
> -        do_cpu_init(cpu);
> -    }
>      if (env->interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_SIPI) {
>          kvm_cpu_synchronize_state(env);
>          do_cpu_sipi(cpu);
> -- 
> 1.8.1.4


--
                        Gleb.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]