[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] memory: drop _overlap variant
From: |
Avi Kivity |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] memory: drop _overlap variant |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:14:25 +0200 |
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> The IOAPIC is actually closer to ISA, but again it's sufficient to
>> move it to the PCI address space. I doubt its priority matters.
>
> Well moving IOAPIC to PCI seems strange, it's not a PCI thing,
> and I think it can be moved outside PCI though guests don't do it.
Look at the 440fx/piix datasheets. It's connected to the piix which
decodes its address. So it's definitely part of the pci address
space.
> So I think ideally we really should have it look something like:
>
> sysbus -> ioapic
> -> pci -> msi
>
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] memory: drop _overlap variant, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] memory: drop _overlap variant, Avi Kivity, 2013/02/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] memory: drop _overlap variant, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2013/02/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] memory: drop _overlap variant, Avi Kivity, 2013/02/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] memory: drop _overlap variant, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2013/02/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] memory: drop _overlap variant, Avi Kivity, 2013/02/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] memory: drop _overlap variant, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2013/02/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] memory: drop _overlap variant, Avi Kivity, 2013/02/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] memory: drop _overlap variant, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2013/02/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] memory: drop _overlap variant, Avi Kivity, 2013/02/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] memory: drop _overlap variant, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2013/02/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC] memory: drop _overlap variant,
Avi Kivity <=