[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu-next v3 0/4] target-i386: X86CPU subclasses
From: |
Andreas Färber |
Subject: |
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu-next v3 0/4] target-i386: X86CPU subclasses |
Date: |
Sat, 2 Feb 2013 01:37:04 +0100 |
Hello,
Long announced, here it is after the freeze: My 3rd attempt at CPU subclasses.
v3 is closer to v1 again, slimmed down not to touch x86_def_t much.
It was noticed that in theory a QOM class enumeration could lead to the host
CPU class_init running before kvm_init(). My proposal is to make the class_init
reentrant and to re-run it from target-i386's kvm_arch_init() if necessary.
Similar to target-ppc, -cpu host code is placed into kvm.c rather than cpu.c.
This conversion is an interim solution to get the code structured in a
QOM-friendly way and to reach a hot-plug friendly and cross-target aligned
CPU initialization. It decouples the work of introducing subclasses (to hide
object initialization from cpu_init() and device_add) from any x86-internal
improvements (like Igor's global compat properties set from pc-x.y machines).
The -cpu ? and QMP support is still based on array iteration.
Based on qom-cpu-next queue, which contains some cpu_init() cleanups already.
Available for testing here:
git://github.com/afaerber/qemu-cpu.git qom-cpu-x86-subclasses.v3
https://github.com/afaerber/qemu-cpu/commits/qom-cpu-x86-subclasses.v3
Regards,
Andreas
v2 -> v3:
* Instead of re-coding all CPU definitions as class_init functions, leave
the built-in definition array in place and place x86_def_t in the class.
* Use kvm_arch_init() hook to assure class_init succeeds for -cpu host.
Suggested by Eduardo.
v1-> v2:
* Instead of turning x86_def_t into X86CPUInfo to initialize classes,
drop it completely and register types manually with customizable TypeInfos
* Use new list facilities for printing -cpu ? models
* Adopt new name scheme suggested by Eduardo and ideas from my alpha series
* Keep short names in -cpu ? output for alignment reasons
* Merge cpu_x86_init() into cpu.c:cpu_x86_register()
* Append patch showing Haswell as subclass of SandyBridge
Cc: Anthony Liguori <address@hidden>
Cc: Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <address@hidden>
Cc: Blue Swirl <address@hidden>
Cc: Richard Henderson <address@hidden>
Andreas Färber (4):
target-i386: Move cpu_x86_init()
target-i386: Split command line parsing out of cpu_x86_register()
target-i386: Slim conversion to X86CPU subclasses
Remove cpudef_setup() hooks
arch_init.c | 7 -
bsd-user/main.c | 3 -
include/sysemu/arch_init.h | 1 -
linux-user/main.c | 3 -
target-i386/cpu-qom.h | 24 ++++
target-i386/cpu.c | 326 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
target-i386/cpu.h | 3 -
target-i386/helper.c | 24 ----
target-i386/kvm.c | 93 +++++++++++++
vl.c | 7 -
10 Dateien geändert, 247 Zeilen hinzugefügt(+), 244 Zeilen entfernt(-)
--
1.7.10.4
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu-next v3 0/4] target-i386: X86CPU subclasses,
Andreas Färber <=