qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU buildbot maintenance state


From: Stefan Hajnoczi
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU buildbot maintenance state
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:54:32 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:31:22AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>   Hi,
> 
> > Gerd: Are you willing to co-maintain the QEMU buildmaster with Daniel
> > and Christian?  It would be awesome if you could do this given your
> > experience running and customizing buildbot.
> 
> I'll try to set aside some time for that.  Christians idea to host the
> config at github is good, that certainly makes it easier to balance
> things to more people.
> 
> Another thing which would be helpful:  Any chance we can setup a
> maintainer tree mirror @ git.qemu.org?  A single repository where each
> maintainer tree shows up as a branch?
> 
> This would make the buildbot setup *alot* easier.  We can go for a
> AnyBranchScheduler then with BuildFactory and BuildConfig shared,
> instead of needing one BuildFactory and BuildConfig per branch.  Also
> makes the buildbot web interface less cluttered as we don't have a
> insane amount of BuildConfigs any more.  And saves some resources
> (bandwidth + diskspace) for the buildslaves.
> 
> I think people who want to look what is coming or who want to test stuff
> cooking it would be a nice service too if they have a one-stop shop
> where they can get everything.

I sent a pull request that makes the BuildFactory definitions simpler
using a single create_build_factory() function:

https://github.com/b1-systems/buildbot/pull/1

Keep in mind that BuildFactories differ not just by repo/branch but
also:
 * in-tree or out-of-tree
 * extra ./configure arguments
 * gmake instead of make

I think this means it is not as simple as defining a single
BuildFactory.

Stefan



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]