qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/7] target-alpha: Add support for -cpu ?


From: Eduardo Habkost
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/7] target-alpha: Add support for -cpu ?
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 13:37:25 -0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:04:00AM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Implement alphabetical listing of CPU subclasses.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <address@hidden>
> ---
>  target-alpha/cpu.c |   41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  target-alpha/cpu.h |    4 +++-
>  2 Dateien geändert, 44 Zeilen hinzugefügt(+), 1 Zeile entfernt(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target-alpha/cpu.c b/target-alpha/cpu.c
> index e1a5739..ab25c44 100644
> --- a/target-alpha/cpu.c
> +++ b/target-alpha/cpu.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,47 @@
>  #include "qemu-common.h"
>  
>  
> +typedef struct AlphaCPUListState {
> +    fprintf_function cpu_fprintf;
> +    FILE *file;
> +} AlphaCPUListState;
> +
> +/* Sort alphabetically by type name. */
> +static gint alpha_cpu_list_compare(gconstpointer a, gconstpointer b)
> +{
> +    ObjectClass *class_a = (ObjectClass *)a;
> +    ObjectClass *class_b = (ObjectClass *)b;
> +    const char *name_a, *name_b;
> +
> +    name_a = object_class_get_name(class_a);
> +    name_b = object_class_get_name(class_b);
> +    return strcmp(name_a, name_b);
> +}
> +
> +static void alpha_cpu_list_entry(gpointer data, gpointer user_data)
> +{
> +    ObjectClass *oc = data;
> +    AlphaCPUListState *s = user_data;
> +
> +    (*s->cpu_fprintf)(s->file, "  %s\n",
> +                      object_class_get_name(oc));
> +}
> +
> +void alpha_cpu_list(FILE *f, fprintf_function cpu_fprintf)
> +{
> +    AlphaCPUListState s = {
> +        .file = f,
> +        .cpu_fprintf = cpu_fprintf,
> +    };
> +    GSList *list;
> +
> +    list = object_class_get_list(TYPE_ALPHA_CPU, false);
> +    list = g_slist_sort(list, alpha_cpu_list_compare);
> +    (*cpu_fprintf)(f, "Available CPUs:\n");
> +    g_slist_foreach(list, alpha_cpu_list_entry, &s);
> +    g_slist_free(list);
> +}

target-arm has very similar code. Isn't it better to first write a
common reusable function to list CPU models using the list of
subclasses, instead of adding very similar functions to all
architectures?

-- 
Eduardo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]