qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 12/12] pseries: Generate unique LIOBN


From: David Gibson
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 12/12] pseries: Generate unique LIOBNs for PCI host bridges
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 11:57:05 +1100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 02:26:09PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 10:27:11AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> > 
> > On 19.11.2012, at 23:51, David Gibson wrote:
> > 
> > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 05:34:12PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> > >> 
> > >> On 13.11.2012, at 03:47, David Gibson wrote:
> > >> 
> > >>> From: Alexey Kardashevskiy <address@hidden>
> > >>> 
> > >>> In future (with VFIO) we will have multiple PCI host bridges on
> > >>> pseries.  Each one needs a unique LIOBN (IOMMU id).  At the moment we
> > >>> derive these from the pci domain number, but the whole notion of
> > >>> domain numbers on the qemu side is bogus and in any case they're not
> > >>> actually uniquely allocated at this point.
> > >>> 
> > >>> This patch, therefore uses a simple sequence counter to generate
> > >>> unique LIOBNs for PCI host bridges.
> > >>> 
> > >>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <address@hidden>
> > >>> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <address@hidden>
> > >> 
> > >> I don't really like the idea of having a global variable just
> > >> because our domain ID generation seems to not work as
> > >> expected. Michael, any comments here?
> > > 
> > > Well, the patch I sent which changed domain id generation was
> > > ignored.  In any case, as I said, the whole concept of domain numbers
> > 
> > Michael?
> 
> This is user visible, right?
> So IMHO we should have the user specify LIOBN through a property,
> rather than assign what's essentially a random value.

Well, I can implement an override through a property, which could be
useful in some circumstances.  But we still need to have qemu generate
unique defaults, rather than forcing it to be specified in every case.

> For ACPI, domain number can go into _SEG method -
> this is what linux seems to use to assign domain numbers
> so if we do this things match.

I don't follow.

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]