qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block/vmdk.c: Fixed major bug in VMDK WRITE and REA


From: Gerhard Wiesinger
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block/vmdk.c: Fixed major bug in VMDK WRITE and READ handling - FIXES DATA CORRUPTION
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 09:22:18 +0100 (CET)
User-agent: Alpine 2.02 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14)

Fixed a MAJOR BUG in VMDK files on file boundaries on reads
and ALSO ON WRITES WHICH MIGHT CORRUPT THE IMAGE AND DATA!!!!!!

Triggered for example with the following VMDK file (partly listed):
# Extent description
RW 4193792 FLAT "XP-W1-f001.vmdk" 0
RW 2097664 FLAT "XP-W1-f002.vmdk" 0
RW 4193792 FLAT "XP-W1-f003.vmdk" 0
RW 512 FLAT "XP-W1-f004.vmdk" 0
RW 4193792 FLAT "XP-W1-f005.vmdk" 0
RW 2097664 FLAT "XP-W1-f006.vmdk" 0
RW 4193792 FLAT "XP-W1-f007.vmdk" 0
RW 512 FLAT "XP-W1-f008.vmdk" 0

Patch includes:
1.) Patch fixes wrong calculation on extent boundaries. Especially it fixes the 
relativeness of the sector number to the current extent.

Verfied correctness with:
1.) Converted either with Virtualbox to VDI and then with qemu-img and then 
with qemu-img only
VBoxManage clonehd --format vdi /VM/XP-W/new/XP-W1.vmdk 
~/.VirtualBox/Harddisks/XP-W1-new-test.vdi
./qemu-img convert -O raw ~/.VirtualBox/Harddisks/XP-W1-new-test.vdi 
/root/QEMU/VM-XP-W1/XP-W1-via-VBOX.img
md5sum /root/QEMU/VM-XP-W/XP-W1-direct.img
md5sum /root/QEMU/VM-XP-W/XP-W1-via-VBOX.img
=> same MD5 hash
2.) Verified debug log files
3.) Run Windows XP successfully
4.) chkdsk run successfully without any errors

Signed-off-by: Gerhard Wiesinger <address@hidden>
---
 block/vmdk.c | 10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/vmdk.c b/block/vmdk.c
index 1a80e5a..51398c0 100644
--- a/block/vmdk.c
+++ b/block/vmdk.c
@@ -1092,6 +1092,7 @@ static int vmdk_read(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t 
sector_num,
     BDRVVmdkState *s = bs->opaque;
     int ret;
     uint64_t n, index_in_cluster;
+    uint64_t extent_begin_sector, extent_relative_sector_num;
     VmdkExtent *extent = NULL;
     uint64_t cluster_offset;

@@ -1103,7 +1104,9 @@ static int vmdk_read(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t 
sector_num,
         ret = get_cluster_offset(
                             bs, extent, NULL,
                             sector_num << 9, 0, &cluster_offset);
-        index_in_cluster = sector_num % extent->cluster_sectors;
+        extent_begin_sector = extent->end_sector - extent->sectors;
+        extent_relative_sector_num = sector_num - extent_begin_sector;
+        index_in_cluster = extent_relative_sector_num % 
extent->cluster_sectors;
         n = extent->cluster_sectors - index_in_cluster;
         if (n > nb_sectors) {
             n = nb_sectors;
@@ -1154,6 +1157,7 @@ static int vmdk_write(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t 
sector_num,
     VmdkExtent *extent = NULL;
     int n, ret;
     int64_t index_in_cluster;
+    uint64_t extent_begin_sector, extent_relative_sector_num;
     uint64_t cluster_offset;
     VmdkMetaData m_data;

@@ -1196,7 +1200,9 @@ static int vmdk_write(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t 
sector_num,
         if (ret) {
             return -EINVAL;
         }
-        index_in_cluster = sector_num % extent->cluster_sectors;
+        extent_begin_sector = extent->end_sector - extent->sectors;
+        extent_relative_sector_num = sector_num - extent_begin_sector;
+        index_in_cluster = extent_relative_sector_num % 
extent->cluster_sectors;
         n = extent->cluster_sectors - index_in_cluster;
         if (n > nb_sectors) {
             n = nb_sectors;
--
1.7.11.7



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]