[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] HACKING: List areas where we may rely on impdef
From: |
malc |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] HACKING: List areas where we may rely on impdef C behaviour |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Oct 2012 20:55:16 +0400 (MSK) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.00 (LNX 1167 2008-08-23) |
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 30 October 2012 16:40, malc <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Oct 2012, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >
> >> Add a section to HACKING describing the bits of implementation
> >> defined C compiler behaviour which C code in QEMU is allowed
> >> to rely on.
> >
> > People who will desperately do a text search for "behaviour" in
> > relevant standards will soon learn that the british spelling is
> > not favoured by WG14. Other than that this addition to the document
> > looks fine (a link to the freely available drafts and/or wikipedia
> > reference would be nice)
>
> This one, right?
Yes.
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/WG14/www/docs/n1256.pdf
> ("Final version of the C99 standard with corrigenda TC1, TC2, and
> TC3 included, formatted as a draft", to borrow wikipedia's description).
>
> I guess I should also say we code to C99 in particular (ie not
> C89 or C11).
--
mailto:address@hidden