qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] slirp: Fix spelling in comment (enought -> enough,


From: Stefan Weil
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] slirp: Fix spelling in comment (enought -> enough, insure -> ensure)
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 20:57:38 +0200

Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <address@hidden>
---

As a non native speaker, I feel that 'ensure' is better here than 'insure'.
Could a native speaker please confirm that?

Thanks,

Stefan

 slirp/ip_icmp.h |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/slirp/ip_icmp.h b/slirp/ip_icmp.h
index 1a1af91..be4426b 100644
--- a/slirp/ip_icmp.h
+++ b/slirp/ip_icmp.h
@@ -92,8 +92,8 @@ struct icmp {
 
 /*
  * Lower bounds on packet lengths for various types.
- * For the error advice packets must first insure that the
- * packet is large enought to contain the returned ip header.
+ * For the error advice packets must first ensure that the
+ * packet is large enough to contain the returned ip header.
  * Only then can we do the check to see if 64 bits of packet
  * data have been returned, since we need to check the returned
  * ip header length.
-- 
1.7.10




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]