[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM Call minutes for 2012-09-25
From: |
Anthony Liguori |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM Call minutes for 2012-09-25 |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:13:44 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Notmuch/0.13.2+93~ged93d79 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
Luiz Capitulino <address@hidden> writes:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:59:00 +0200
> Markus Armbruster <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Juan Quintela <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > This are this week minutes:
>> >
>> > - URI parsing library for glusterfs: libxml2 vs. in-tree "fork" of the
>> > same code. (Paolo)
>> > * code hasn't changed in 2 years, it is really stable
>> > * anthony wants to copy the code
>> >
>> > - there are several commands that do blocking IO
>> > dump-guest-memory/screen-dump
>> > convert to asynchronous commands after we move all to QAPI
>> > only two commands missingto port to QAPI, and one is posted on list
>> > non-blocking IO to a file is a challenge
>> > (we have code on the block layer for it)
>> >
>> > - how to give errors from OpenFile to the caller
>> > putting errno as int: bad idea
>> > putting as strerrno string: also a bad idea, no warantees
>>
>> Use the identifiers instead of their non-portable numeric encodings or
>> strerror() descriptions: "EPERM", "EINVAL", ...
>
> Yes, but for me the important point in this discussion is whether
> or not a new class is necessary. I think it it isn't.
If we have a tool that needs to differientiate errors, chances are
another user needs to also.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori