qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] aio: another fix to the walking_handlers logic


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] aio: another fix to the walking_handlers logic
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 17:06:11 +0200

The AIO dispatch loop will call QLIST_REMOVE and g_free even if there
are other pending calls to qemu_aio_wait outside the current one.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
---
        This is on top of the existing fix that is posted as part of
        the glusterfs series.  Bharata, can you add this patch as well?

 aio.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file modificato, 5 inserzioni(+), 5 rimozioni(-)

diff --git a/aio.c b/aio.c
index 99b8b72..c738a4e 100644
--- a/aio.c
+++ b/aio.c
@@ -159,14 +159,14 @@ bool qemu_aio_wait(void)
 
     /* if we have any readable fds, dispatch event */
     if (ret > 0) {
-        walking_handlers++;
-
         /* we have to walk very carefully in case
          * qemu_aio_set_fd_handler is called while we're walking */
         node = QLIST_FIRST(&aio_handlers);
         while (node) {
             AioHandler *tmp;
 
+            walking_handlers++;
+
             if (!node->deleted &&
                 FD_ISSET(node->fd, &rdfds) &&
                 node->io_read) {
@@ -181,13 +181,13 @@ bool qemu_aio_wait(void)
             tmp = node;
             node = QLIST_NEXT(node, node);
 
-            if (tmp->deleted) {
+            walking_handlers--;
+
+            if (!walking_handlers && tmp->deleted) {
                 QLIST_REMOVE(tmp, node);
                 g_free(tmp);
             }
         }
-
-        walking_handlers--;
     }
 
     return true;
-- 
1.7.12




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]