[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-system-i386 vs qemu-system-x86_64 ?
From: |
Jan Kiszka |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-system-i386 vs qemu-system-x86_64 ? |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Sep 2012 12:12:43 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080226 SUSE/2.0.0.12-1.1 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 |
On 2012-09-14 12:03, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> On 14.09.2012 14:00, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> []
>> The major difference in qemu-system-i386 vs. qemu-system-x86_64 is on
>> the TCG side: We measured noticeable performance benefits when running
>> 32/16 bit OSes against qemu-system-i386 vs. using qemu-system-x86_64. I
>> don't have numbers at hand, but colleagues decided to use the 32-bit
>> version for that reason (when no KVM is available).
>
> Interesting. Maybe someone should look at the difference on TCG side
> and merge interesting bits from i386 to x86_64... :)
I suppose the difference - for our use cases at least - lies in the
different register and address sizes. Maybe there is room for more
runtime optimizations, we never looked in that details as -i386 still
works fine. And, if you are on 32-bit host (see below) - but we aren't,
qemu-system-x86_64 hurts even more.
>
> The thing is: x86_64 becomes the only x86 platform these days, or at
> least the MAIN platform.
I know, and I'm telling everyone. Still, too many crazy people keep on
installing 32-bit distros or even 32-bit kernels. Maybe x64-32 will
improve this.
>
> Thank you for the clarification -- very useful information indeed!
>
> /mjt
>
You are welcome.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-system-i386 vs qemu-system-x86_64 ?, Blue Swirl, 2012/09/14