|
From: | Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-scsi vs. virtio-blk |
Date: | Thu, 09 Aug 2012 14:31:27 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0 |
Am 09.08.2012 14:19, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
Il 09/08/2012 14:08, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG ha scritto:virtio-scsi: rand 4k: write: io=822448KB, bw=82228KB/s, iops=20557, runt= 10002msec read : io=950920KB, bw=94694KB/s, iops=23673, runt= 10042msec seq: write: io=2436MB, bw=231312KB/s, iops=56, runt= 10784msec read : io=3248MB, bw=313799KB/s, iops=76, runt= 10599msec virtio-blk: rand 4k: write: io=896472KB, bw=89051KB/s, iops=22262, runt= 10067msec read : io=1710MB, bw=175073KB/s, iops=43768, runt= 10002msec seq: write: io=4008MB, bw=391285KB/s, iops=95, runt= 10489msec read : io=5748MB, bw=570178KB/s, iops=139, runt= 10323msecThanks; some overhead is expected, but not this much. Especially the sequential case is bad, what disk is this?
right now this is an external iscsi Nexentastor. Locally i can't get this bandwith nor these iops to test.
guest uses noop right now. Disk Host is nexentastor running open solaris. I use libiscsi right now so the disks are not visible in both cases (virtio-blk and virtio-scsi) to the host right now.Things to test include: - using the deadline I/O scheduler on at least the host, and possibly the guest too
- running perf on the guest and the host (separately) to get profiles
Which command of perf? Just perf top? Stefan
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |