[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 1/3] block: Add bdrv_are_busy()
From: |
Luiz Capitulino |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 1/3] block: Add bdrv_are_busy() |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Jul 2012 09:55:48 -0300 |
On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 12:10:39 +0200
Benoît Canet <address@hidden> wrote:
> Le Monday 23 Jul 2012 à 14:15:01 (-0300), Luiz Capitulino a écrit :
> > On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 16:22:58 +0200
> > address@hidden wrote:
> >
> > > From: Benoît Canet <address@hidden>
> > >
> > > bdrv_are_busy will be used to check if any of the bs are in use
> > > or if one of them have a running block job.
> > >
> > > The first user will be qmp_migrate().
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Benoit Canet <address@hidden>
> > > ---
> > > block.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> > > block.h | 2 ++
> > > 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/block.c b/block.c
> > > index ce7eb8f..bc8f160 100644
> > > --- a/block.c
> > > +++ b/block.c
> > > @@ -4027,6 +4027,19 @@ out:
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +int bdrv_are_busy(void)
> > > +{
> > > + BlockDriverState *bs;
> > > +
> > > + QTAILQ_FOREACH(bs, &bdrv_states, list) {
> > > + if (bs->job || bdrv_in_use(bs)) {
> > > + return -EBUSY;
> > > + }
> > > + }
> >
> > IMO, this should return true/false. The name is a bit misleading too, as it
> > gives the impression that are existing bdrvs are busy. I'd call it
> > bdrv_any_busy() or bdrv_any_in_use().
>
> Hello Anthony,
>
> Stefanha is in favor of returning -EBUSY and Luiz Capitulino would prefer
> the function to return a boolean.
> Could you decide which option is the best ?
Stefan's opnion certainly has precedence over mine on block layer stuff,
this was just an IMO.
Stefan, did you consider returning a boolean?
>
> Regards
>
> Benoît
>
> >
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > void *block_job_create(const BlockJobType *job_type, BlockDriverState
> > > *bs,
> > > int64_t speed, BlockDriverCompletionFunc *cb,
> > > void *opaque, Error **errp)
> > > diff --git a/block.h b/block.h
> > > index c89590d..0a3de2f 100644
> > > --- a/block.h
> > > +++ b/block.h
> > > @@ -337,6 +337,8 @@ void bdrv_disable_copy_on_read(BlockDriverState *bs);
> > > void bdrv_set_in_use(BlockDriverState *bs, int in_use);
> > > int bdrv_in_use(BlockDriverState *bs);
> > >
> > > +int bdrv_are_busy(void);
> > > +
> > > enum BlockAcctType {
> > > BDRV_ACCT_READ,
> > > BDRV_ACCT_WRITE,
> >
>
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 2/3] qerror: Add error telling that block dev usage prevents migration, benoit . canet, 2012/07/23
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 3/3] migration: block migration when any of the block device is busy, benoit . canet, 2012/07/23
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 0/3] Block migration if any of the block device is busy, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2012/07/23
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 0/3] Block migration if any of the block device is busy, Kevin Wolf, 2012/07/24