[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] plan for device assignment upstream
From: |
Avi Kivity |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] plan for device assignment upstream |
Date: |
Mon, 02 Jul 2012 12:29:37 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120605 Thunderbird/13.0 |
On 07/02/2012 12:18 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> I've been thinking hard about Jan's patches for device
> assignment. Basically while I thought it makes sense
> to make all devices: assignment and not - behave the
> same and use same APIs for injecting irqs, Anthony thinks there is huge
> value in making irq propagation hierarchical and device assignment
> should be special cased.
>
> We seem to be at impasse for now and I think merging
> assignment ASAP has higher value than this specific
> issue. So I fold - let's do it as Anthony and Jan's
> original patches proposed.
>
> Jan, can you please rebase and repost your original patchset (against
> master, not against pci) that added query for host irqs callbacks for
> device assignment? I'll re-review ignoring the idea of using the cache,
> with intent apply after I'll drop cache code from the pci branch in a
> couple of days (busy otherwise now).
>
> I still intend to rework this later on, but that can wait.
Agree with both your ideas about the API and the decision to rework it
in tree.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function