|
From: | Corey Bryant |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] qmp/hmp: Add QMP getfd command that returns fd |
Date: | Wed, 06 Jun 2012 15:42:15 -0400 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 |
On 06/06/2012 01:50 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 10:04:23 -0400 Corey Bryant<address@hidden> wrote:Today, we return a dict on success: { "return": {} } But this patch changes it to: { "return": 42 } There are two ways to do this without breaking compatibility: 1. Add a new command (say get-file-descriptor)What do you think about using getfd2 for the command name? I'm thinking getfd2 may be more obvious that it corresponds to closefd.We're going for more descriptive names in QMP. I don't have strong objections against get-fd2 if there's consensus that 'fd' is better than 'file-descriptor', although 'fd2' is a bit confusing.
I really don't have a strong opinion either so I'll do whatever the consensus wants. Does anyone else have an opinion?
That assumes we'll use the same array internally to store fds and closefd can be used to close the fd opened by get-file-descriptor/getfd2.You mean using the same array for getfd and get-file-descriptor? Yes, the descriptor list is global.
Yes, that's what I meant.
I assume this approach would still return an int: { "return": 42 }The new command? Yes.
Ok
2. Return a type instead, like: { "return": { "file-descriptor": 42 } } I think I prefer item 1, as we could also take the opportunity to fix the argument type and improve its name. Besides, we don't have a schema to do 2.Is it fdname that you think could be improved? fdname seems pretty straight forward to me.What I'm trying to avoid is having too short names when that's not necessary. I think I'd just use 'name' or 'file-descriptor-name' for the verbose option, but I don't have strong objections against 'fdname'.
Unless anyone objects I'll plan on going with more descriptive names, since that is the desired direction for QMP. So we'll have get-file-descriptor for the new command name and file-descriptor-name for the argument name.
-- Regards, Corey
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |