[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Boot failure with MS-Dos 6.22 (due to bad BIOS build?)
From: |
Kevin O'Connor |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Boot failure with MS-Dos 6.22 (due to bad BIOS build?) |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Mar 2012 22:17:32 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 09:03:09PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-03-19 01:29, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 04:25:09PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>> EAX=ffffffff EBX=ffffffff ECX=0000c934 EDX=00000068
> >>> ESI=00006801 EDI=00000000 EBP=0000002b ESP=0000fff5
> >
> > I traced this down, and it appears to be a stack size issue. It looks
> > like MSDOS calls "int 0x13" with 229 bytes of stack space during its
> > boot. On my build gcc generates the handle_13() function with a
> > maximum of 140 bytes of stack space utilized (according to
> > tools/checkstack.py). On your build, gcc created it with a maximum of
> > 216 bytes. The entry functions use 42 bytes of stack space. Add it
> > up and you can see that the additional stack space that gcc used
> > caused %esp to wrap and the stack was corrupted.
> >
> > I'm not sure how to best work around this. One way is to sprinkle
> > "noinline" keywords through disk.c. (It seems like gcc got in trouble
> > on your build by inlining many functions into disk_13().) Another way
> > would be to jump into the extra stack (the disk code already uses its
> > own stack) earlier in the handle_13 code.
> >
> > Also, can you see what happens if you change "--param
> > large-stack-frame=4" to "--param large-stack-frame=0" in the build?
>
> This makes no difference here, still 216 bytes.
I've noticed that if one takes a pointer to a variable on the stack,
gcc seems to do a poor job managing stack space. I'm guessing the
patch below would fix the issue. It's a bit ugly though.
-Kevin
diff --git a/src/disk.c b/src/disk.c
index 7a58af4..706b9f4 100644
--- a/src/disk.c
+++ b/src/disk.c
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ fillLCHS(struct drive_s *drive_g, u16 *nlc, u16 *nlh, u16
*nlspt)
}
// Perform read/write/verify using old-style chs accesses
-static void
+static void noinline
basic_access(struct bregs *regs, struct drive_s *drive_g, u16 command)
{
struct disk_op_s dop;
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ basic_access(struct bregs *regs, struct drive_s *drive_g,
u16 command)
}
// Perform read/write/verify using new-style "int13ext" accesses.
-static void
+static void noinline
extended_access(struct bregs *regs, struct drive_s *drive_g, u16 command)
{
struct disk_op_s dop;
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ disk_1304(struct bregs *regs, struct drive_s *drive_g)
}
// format disk track
-static void
+static void noinline
disk_1305(struct bregs *regs, struct drive_s *drive_g)
{
debug_stub(regs);
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ disk_1305(struct bregs *regs, struct drive_s *drive_g)
}
// read disk drive parameters
-static void
+static void noinline
disk_1308(struct bregs *regs, struct drive_s *drive_g)
{
u16 ebda_seg = get_ebda_seg();
@@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ disk_1314(struct bregs *regs, struct drive_s *drive_g)
}
// read disk drive size
-static void
+static void noinline
disk_1315(struct bregs *regs, struct drive_s *drive_g)
{
disk_ret(regs, DISK_RET_SUCCESS);
@@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ disk_1345(struct bregs *regs, struct drive_s *drive_g)
}
// IBM/MS eject media
-static void
+static void noinline
disk_1346(struct bregs *regs, struct drive_s *drive_g)
{
if (regs->dl < EXTSTART_CD) {