Re: [Qemu-devel] We need more reviewers/maintainers!!

[Anthony Liguori]

On 03/13/2012 09:39 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 03/13/2012 04:12 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > > > (plus it puts an extra person in the loop which is pretty
> > > > much guaranteed to slow things down).
> > >
> > > Having the committers process all these patches (and monitor all
> > > patches) is guaranteed to slow things down too.
> >
> > They're in the loop anyway, because they have to process the pull
> > request just as they would a single patch.
>
> Anthony's shunting emails with [PULL] into a special queue, so yes
> they're in the loop, but it's a smaller one.

Right, if we want urgency on something, there has to be a filterable keyword.  I 
don't read every single message on qemu-devel every hour of the day.

The advantage of [PULL] over [urgent] is that it fits the existing workflows. 
It's clear who should be doing [PULL] requests.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>