qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] ioctl() numbers are unsigned (the man page lies


From: Jan Kiszka
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] ioctl() numbers are unsigned (the man page lies)
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:27:30 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080226 SUSE/2.0.0.12-1.1 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666

On 2012-02-10 07:43, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 11:06:57AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-02-09 10:58, David Gibson wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 09:30:09AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> Looks like the subject would warmly welcome a "kvm:" tag.
>>>>
>>>> On 2012-02-09 05:22, David Gibson wrote:
>>> [snip]
>>>>
>>>> What about naming the problem instead:
>>>>
>>>> /* Comparison with IOCTL macros on 32-bit hosts requires unsigned. */
>>>
>>> Just once, it would be nice to post something to this list and get a
>>> substantive comment _before_ the bitching about minutiae.
>>>
>>> Oh, and it's not just 32-bit hosts, it's anywhere sizeof(int)==4,
>>> which includes ppc64 amongst other 64-bit hosts.
>>
>> Then state "if int is 32 bits". The comment is unfortunately not helpful
>> without the commit log.
> 
> It'd also be nice if people didn't drop me from the CC list on my own
> patches.

Sorry, that was not intentional. My mail client possibly followed a tag
like in this mail:

Mail-Followup-To: Jan Kiszka <address@hidden>, address@hidden,
        address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden

I had to add you by hand to the list again. Maybe you wanna check what
is causing this on your side.

Jan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]