[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Tuesday 24
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Tuesday 24 |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:53:28 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0 |
On 01/24/2012 03:30 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> * qtest/libos: Python or C?
>
> Both.
More importantly: When?:-)
Are there still any problems that must be fixed before it can be merged?
There was no discussion on my alternative proposal on IRQ interception.
Which might mean it's all fine and it will just replace Anthony's
qtest_interrupt_controller, but I'm not that optimist. :) Certainly
Anthony's approach to IRQ interception had some objections from Peter
(which I second).
Also, Anthony's sleep(1) hack _can_ be eliminated, I didn't have it in
my Python version.
In that series I also had vm_clock management, but it can go in afterwards.
Similarly, PyUnit integration can be committed separately. Knowing that
the answer is "both" is fine.
URLs:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/132558 (IRQ/timer)
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/132512 (Python)
Paolo