On 12/15/2011 04:21 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
cpu-common.h | 36 -----------------------------
exec-obsolete.h | 66
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
exec.c | 3 ++
hw/etraxfs_eth.c | 3 --
memory.c | 3 ++
5 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 exec-obsolete.h
I would prefer exec-private.h or memory-private.h. Right now, the
situation is that exec.c provides a low-level interface to memory.c.
If the situation changes, the header will disappear.
Since the header is going to disappear, does it really matter? I plan
on removing it long before 1.1.