qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] PPC: Fix linker scripts on ppc hosts


From: Paul Brook
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] PPC: Fix linker scripts on ppc hosts
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:34:08 +0000
User-agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.1.0-1-amd64; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; )

> >> The proper solution would be to rewrite mmap.c to be smarter (perhaps
> >> by looking at /proc/self/maps and reserving a lot of space with
> >> PROT_NONE mappings at startup and then managing it itself), but so far
> >> nobody's done that
> > 
> > Yes they have. That's what -R does.
> 
> -R doesn't happen by default, it requires you to specify how much you
> want, and it insists that the space all be in one chunk.

I've covered the defaults elsewhere in this thread.

If your 64-bit host can't find a contiguous 4G block of address space then 
you've much more serious issues.  System policies preventing applications 
allocating that much address space are a different problem, and splitting the 
into chunks would not help.

> > We used to try and parse /proc/self/maps.  This caused more problems than
> > it solved.  It doesn't cover things like mmap_min_addr, and you have to
> > re-parse it before every allocation in case the host libc allocated
> > something new in between.
> 
> If you've used a PROT_NONE mapping to claim the space at startup, host libc
> doesn't override that mapping, does it?

Ah, I see what you mean.

If you're solving problems other than 32-on-64 then there's some argument for 
allowing discontiguous blocks.  I'm not convinced there's much point parsing 
/proc/self/maps though.  Just keep calling mmap for sensible sized blocks 
until you either have enough address space or it fails.  In the latter case 
maybe free some back immediately to give the host libc room to work.

The hard bit is coming up with heuristics for "sensibe size block" and "have 
enough".  /proc/self/maps only tells you which areas of the host VM are 
currently mapped.  What we really want to know is which areas are available to 
be mapped.  On 32-bit hosts this may be this may be less than half of the gaps 
in /proc/self/maps. On 64-bit hosts it's many orders of magnitude smaller.  
For example x86-64 only has 47-bits of usable virtual address space.

Nested qemu is also going to make a complete mess of /proc/self/maps, though I 
admit you're probably going to trip over other bugs first :-)

Paul



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]