|
From: | Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/18] qom: dynamic properties and composition tree (v2) |
Date: | Mon, 05 Dec 2011 18:01:00 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110930 Thunderbird/7.0.1 |
On 12/05/2011 05:38 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
-device would use parse/print, not get/set. So it would still use the strings.I don't want -device to have special knowledge of properties. I want it to set the properties are strings. The property implementation is private to Object.
Ok, I see where you're coming from with legacy properties too. Yeah, then it makes sense to rename properties (to legacy<name> perhaps) as long as the equivalent "name" property is available that uses visitors. I.e. each qdev property would be registered twice, with two different names, one for QOM and one for -device.
Paolo
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |