qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Question] dump memory when host pci device is used by


From: Jan Kiszka
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Question] dump memory when host pci device is used by guest
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 09:01:28 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080226 SUSE/2.0.0.12-1.1 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666

On 2011-10-10 08:59, Wen Congyang wrote:
> At 10/10/2011 02:52 PM, Jan Kiszka Write:
>> On 2011-10-10 04:21, Wen Congyang wrote:
>>> At 10/09/2011 06:23 PM, Richard W.M. Jones Write:
>>>> On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 10:49:57AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>>> As explained in the other replies: It is way more future-proof to use an
>>>>> interface for this which was designed for it (remote gdb) instead of
>>>>> artificially relaxing reasonable constraints of the migration mechanism
>>>>> plus having to follow that format with the post-processing tool.
>>>>
>>>> Any interface that isn't "get this information off my production
>>>> server *now*" so that I can get the server restarted, and send it to
>>>> an expert to analyse -- is a poor interface, whether it was designed
>>>> like that or not.  Perhaps we don't have the right interface at all,
>>>> but remote gdb is not it.
>>>
>>> What about the following idea?
>>>
>>> Introduce a new monitor command named dump, and this command accepts a 
>>> filename.
>>> We can use almost all migration's code. We use this command to dump guest's
>>> memory, so there is no need to check whether the guest has a unmigratable 
>>> device.
>>
>> I do not want to reject this proposal categorically, but I would like to
>> see the gdb path fail /wrt essential requirements first. So far I don't
>> see it would.
> 
> ‘gdb path fail /wrt essential requirements’
> 
> what does it mean?

That you explain why reading reading memory and processor states via the
remote gdb interface and dumping it into a proper core file cannot be
made working for you.

Jan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]