qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Spice-devel] [PATCH] server: don't call reds_stream_fr


From: Yonit Halperin
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Spice-devel] [PATCH] server: don't call reds_stream_free from worker thread context
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 11:43:35 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100921 Fedora/3.1.4-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.4

On 09/02/2011 06:19 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
reds_stream_free() may call the channel_event callback which is not
supposed to be callsed from worker thread context.  This patch moves
the reds_stream_free call for the display channel from the worker to
the dispatcher to fix this issue.

[ Note: not tested yet, against 0.8 branch, sending out for review&
         comments nevertheless ]

Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann<address@hidden>
---
  server/red_dispatcher.c |    5 +++++
  server/red_worker.c     |    3 +--
  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/server/red_dispatcher.c b/server/red_dispatcher.c
index f74b13e..801a575 100644
--- a/server/red_dispatcher.c
+++ b/server/red_dispatcher.c
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ struct RedDispatcher {
      int y_res;
      int use_hardware_cursor;
      RedDispatcher *next;
+    RedsStream *stream;
      RedWorkerMessage async_message;
      pthread_mutex_t  async_lock;
      QXLDevSurfaceCreate surface_create;
@@ -81,6 +82,7 @@ static void red_dispatcher_set_peer(Channel *channel, 
RedsStream *stream, int mi

      red_printf("");
      dispatcher = (RedDispatcher *)channel->data;
+    dispatcher->stream = stream;
      RedWorkerMessage message = RED_WORKER_MESSAGE_DISPLAY_CONNECT;
      write_message(dispatcher->channel,&message);
      send_data(dispatcher->channel,&stream, sizeof(RedsStream *));
@@ -93,6 +95,9 @@ static void red_dispatcher_shutdown_peer(Channel *channel)
      red_printf("");
      RedWorkerMessage message = RED_WORKER_MESSAGE_DISPLAY_DISCONNECT;
      write_message(dispatcher->channel,&message);
+    read_message(dispatcher->channel,&message);
+    ASSERT(message == RED_WORKER_MESSAGE_READY);
+    reds_stream_free(dispatcher->stream);

Hi,
RED_WORKER_MESSAGE_DISPLAY_DISCONNECT is not the only place that triggers red_disconnect_channel (and as a result, reds_stream_free(dispatcher->stream)). red_disconnect_channel is called also when there is an error upon receive/send and also when timeouts related to the client occur (e.g., in flush_display_commands).

We probably better make the dispatcher bi-directional, i.e., not only push messages to the worker, but also listen.

Cheers,
Yonit.

  }

  static void red_dispatcher_migrate(Channel *channel)
diff --git a/server/red_worker.c b/server/red_worker.c
index 5f07803..f77b0f2 100644
--- a/server/red_worker.c
+++ b/server/red_worker.c
@@ -8486,8 +8486,6 @@ static void red_disconnect_channel(RedChannel *channel)
  {
      channel_release_res(channel);
      red_pipe_clear(channel);
-    reds_stream_free(channel->stream);
-    channel->stream = NULL;
      channel->send_data.blocked = FALSE;
      channel->send_data.size = channel->send_data.pos = 0;
      spice_marshaller_reset(channel->send_data.marshaller);
@@ -10060,6 +10058,7 @@ static void handle_dev_input(EventListener *listener, 
uint32_t events)
      case RED_WORKER_MESSAGE_CURSOR_DISCONNECT:
          red_printf("cursor disconnect");
          red_disconnect_cursor((RedChannel *)worker->cursor_channel);
+        write_ready = 1;
          break;
      case RED_WORKER_MESSAGE_CURSOR_MIGRATE:
          red_printf("cursor migrate");




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]