qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/7] Replace VMSTOP macros with a proper QemuSta


From: Jan Kiszka
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/7] Replace VMSTOP macros with a proper QemuState type
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 12:27:20 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080226 SUSE/2.0.0.12-1.1 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666

On 2011-08-04 12:17, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-08-04 11:55, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 08/03/2011 06:17 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>>> @@ -9,6 +9,20 @@
>>>   #include "notify.h"
>>>
>>>   /* vl.c */
>>> +
>>> +typedef enum {
>>> +    QSTATE_DEBUG,         /* qemu is running under gdb */
>>> +    QSTATE_INTERROR,      /* paused due to an internal error */
>>> +    QSTATE_IOERROR,       /* paused due to an I/O error */
>>> +    QSTATE_PAUSED,        /* paused by the user (ie. the 'stop'
>>> command) */
>>> +    QSTATE_PREMIGRATE,    /* paused preparing to finish migrate */
>>> +    QSTATE_RESTVM,        /* paused restoring the VM state */
>>> +    QSTATE_RUNNING,       /* qemu is running */
>>> +    QSTATE_SAVEVM,        /* paused saving VM state */
>>> +    QSTATE_SHUTDOWN,      /* guest shut down and -no-shutdown is in
>>> use */
>>> +    QSTATE_WATCHDOG       /* watchdog fired and qemu is configured to
>>> pause */
>>> +} QemuState;
>>> +
>>>   extern const char *bios_name;
>>>
>>
>> Why "QemuState"?  In general, "qemu" can be inferred from the fact that
>> we're in qemu.git.  Suggest "RunState".
>>
>> Second, these states can coexist.  A user may pause the VM
>> simultaneously with the watchdog firing or entering premigrate state. 
>> In fact, with multiple monitors, each monitor can pause and resume the
>> vm independently.
>>
>> So I think we should keep a reference count instead of just a start/stop
>> state.  Perhaps
>>
>> vm_stop(QemuState s)
>> {
>>     ++stopcount[s];
>> }
>>
>> vm_is_stopped()
>> {
>>     for (s in states)
>>           if (stopcount[s])
>>               return true;
>>     return false;
>> }
> 
> I don't think this makes sense nor is user-friendly. If one command
> channel suspends the machine, others have the chance to subscribe for
> that event. Maintaining a suspension counter would mean you also need a
> channel to query its value.
> 
> IMHO, there is also no use for defining stopped orthogonally to
> premigrate and other states that imply that the machine is stopped.
> Basically they mean "stopped for/because of X". We just need to avoid
> that you can enter plain stopped state from them by issuing the
> corresponding monitor command. The other way around might be possible,
> though, if there are race windows.

The makes me wonder if qemu_state_set shouldn't validate if the state
transition is legal (simple switch/case). That way, we would have a
central point and could also avoid potential races or logical bugs where
a newly set state is accidentally overwritten due to unexpected
execution order.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]