qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Introduce compiler.h header file


From: Luiz Capitulino
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Introduce compiler.h header file
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:26:18 -0300

On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 18:15:57 +0400 (MSD)
malc <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Thu, 14 Jul 2011, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 22:39:07 +0200
> > Stefan Weil <address@hidden> wrote:
> > 
> > > Am 13.07.2011 18:27, schrieb Luiz Capitulino:
> > > > On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 16:04:52 +0100
> > > > Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On 13 July 2011 15:23, Luiz Capitulino <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > >>> diff --git a/compiler.h b/compiler.h
> > > >>> new file mode 100644
> > > >>> index 0000000..2dfc2c6
> > > >>> --- /dev/null
> > > >>> +++ b/compiler.h
> > > >>> @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
> > > >>> +#ifndef COMPILER_H
> > > >>> +#define COMPILER_H
> > > >>
> > > >> If we don't have a rule that says that all new source files should have
> > > >> a standard-ish format copyright notice and license statement, I think
> > > >> we ought to.
> > > >
> > > > Make sense, but this content comes from qemu-common.h which doesn't
> > > > have that information. I can't choose for the authors. Malc is one of 
> > > > them,
> > > > and he asked me to remove the license text altogether (which makes 
> > > > this public
> > > > domain?)
> > > 
> > > Malc's code was from audio/audio_int.h, so maybe the license text
> > > can be copied from that file.
> > 
> > Malc, are you ok with that?
> > 
> 
> I would be okay with just making it public domain.

May you suggest a text to be put in the file?



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]