[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-serial: Fix segfault on guest boot
From: |
Markus Armbruster |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-serial: Fix segfault on guest boot |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:47:31 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) |
Amit Shah <address@hidden> writes:
> On (Thu) 16 Jun 2011 [13:38:49], Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>> If I start qemu with:
>>
>> # qemu -hda disks/test.img -enable-kvm -m 1G -snapshot \
>> -device virtio-serial \
>> -chardev socket,host=localhost,port=1234,server,nowait,id=foo \
>> -device virtserialport,chardev=foo,name=org.qemu.guest_agent
>>
>> I get a segfault when booting a Fedora 14 guest. The backtrace says:
>>
>> Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
>> #0 0x0000000000420850 in handle_control_message (vser=0x3732bd0,
>> buf=0x2c173e0, len=8) at
>> /home/lcapitulino/src/qmp-unstable/hw/virtio-serial-bus.c:335
>> 335 info = DO_UPCAST(VirtIOSerialPortInfo, qdev, port->dev.info);
>
> Strange, I've not seen it so far in my testing (neither in the daily
> test runs of the virtio-serial testsuite).
>
>> I've also bisected this and git points out to commit:
>>
>> commit a15bb0d6a981de749452a5180fc8084d625671da
>> Author: Markus Armbruster <address@hidden>
>> Date: Wed May 25 14:21:13 2011 +0200
>>
>> virtio-serial: Drop redundant VirtIOSerialPort member info
>>
>> I think what's happening is that the device is not initialized on a
>> VIRTIO_CONSOLE_DEVICE_READY event.
Really?
I believe the device is initialized just fine, but the message refers to
a nonexistant port. The check after find_port_by_id() suggests that's
expected for VIRTIO_CONSOLE_DEVICE_READY.
>> Moving the DO_UPCAST() call to
>> the other events fixes the problem to me.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino <address@hidden>
>> ---
>> hw/virtio-serial-bus.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/virtio-serial-bus.c b/hw/virtio-serial-bus.c
>> index 9a12104..579f676 100644
>> --- a/hw/virtio-serial-bus.c
>> +++ b/hw/virtio-serial-bus.c
>> @@ -332,8 +332,6 @@ static void handle_control_message(VirtIOSerial *vser,
>> void *buf, size_t len)
>> if (!port && cpkt.event != VIRTIO_CONSOLE_DEVICE_READY)
>> return;
>>
>> - info = DO_UPCAST(VirtIOSerialPortInfo, qdev, port->dev.info);
>> -
>
> Ah - this missed the !port check. It should be possible to do this in
> a 'if (port)' block instead of replicating in the individual case
> statements.
You might have to do something like info = port ? DO_UPCAST(...) : NULL
to avoid warnings about info used uninitialized.
[...]
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-serial: Fix segfault on guest boot, Luiz Capitulino, 2011/06/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-serial: Fix segfault on guest boot, Amit Shah, 2011/06/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-serial: Fix segfault on guest boot,
Markus Armbruster <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-serial: Fix segfault on guest boot, Luiz Capitulino, 2011/06/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-serial: Fix segfault on guest boot, Luiz Capitulino, 2011/06/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-serial: Fix segfault on guest boot, Amit Shah, 2011/06/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-serial: Fix segfault on guest boot, Luiz Capitulino, 2011/06/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-serial: Fix segfault on guest boot, Amit Shah, 2011/06/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-serial: Fix segfault on guest boot, Blue Swirl, 2011/06/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-serial: Fix segfault on guest boot, Amit Shah, 2011/06/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-serial: Fix segfault on guest boot, Blue Swirl, 2011/06/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] 80-column rule and breaking output statements, Amit Shah, 2011/06/27