[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] block bug: tray status is not updated (and/or guest ign
From: |
Daniel P. Berrange |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] block bug: tray status is not updated (and/or guest ignores it) |
Date: |
Fri, 27 May 2011 14:41:12 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:39:35AM -0300, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Fri, 27 May 2011 18:10:08 +0530
> Amit Shah <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > On (Fri) 27 May 2011 [17:04:30], Amit Shah wrote:
> > > On (Fri) 27 May 2011 [17:01:35], Amit Shah wrote:
> > > > On (Thu) 26 May 2011 [15:29:29], Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm testing with qemu.git (HEAD aa29141d84d), procedure:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. Start a VM with:
> > > > >
> > > > > # qemu -hda disks/test.img -enable-kvm -m 1G -cdrom
> > > > > Fedora-14-x86_64-DVD.iso
> > > > >
> > > > > 2. Then inside the guest run:
> > > > >
> > > > > # eject /dev/sr0 && mount /dev/sr0 /mnt
> > > > >
> > > > > Results:
> > > > >
> > > > > Actual: The cdrom is successfully mounted
> > > > > Expected: The cdrom is not mounted (mount fails, medium not found)
> > > >
> > > > Really? That's what you expect? :-)
>
> That was the VM behavior before 996faf1ad, therefore it's what I was
> expecting.
>
> > > > Where will the medium go?
>
> We were leaking it then?
>
> > > > What happens is mount auto-closes the tray and mounts whatever is
> > > > there, which is the image you provided. Works as expected, IMO.
> >
> > Confirmed, that's what happens.
>
> Ok. I got this by testing my series that adds the BLOCK_MEDIA_EJECT event.
> At first I thought your commit wasn't handling the tray status correctly
> (which would cause problems to the new event), but it seems to work fine,
> specially now that I know what's doing. Sorry for the noise.
>
> > What's weird though is 'eject' in the monitor makes the cdrom go away
> > -- a subsequent mount in the guest results in a no medium error. I
> > thought we had solved that, Markus?
> >
> > By not doing a bdrv_close() in the do_eject()->eject_device() call
> > path this starts working as expected.
>
> Yes, also note that with the -f option eject is capable of purging
> any block device. I wonder if libvirt (or any client) relies on this.
libvirt will only issue 'eject' on devices which are CDROMs, or Floppy,
never hard disks, etc.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|