[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/4] Improve -icount, fix it with iothread

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 02/23/2011 05:27 PM, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
> For the "almost deadlock" testcase, I think the CRIS image on the
> wiki is OK.

Ah yes, I was understanding that the watchdog itself slowed down too and
didn't trigger.  So I was indeed seeing it (and not patient enough to 
see it boot).

> Still slower than non iothread builds though. In particular if you
> compare icount 10, with and without iothread.

Very good, thanks.  I'll look at it after this series is in, and Jan's 
optimization patch as well hopefully.

Paolo