qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix obvious mistake in pxa2xx i2s driver


From: Aurelien Jarno
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix obvious mistake in pxa2xx i2s driver
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 19:24:46 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 06:59:10PM +0200, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote:
> RST bit is (1 << 3) bit, not (1 << 2), fix condition
> that enables i2s if ENB is set and RST is not set.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vasily Khoruzhick <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/pxa2xx.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/pxa2xx.c b/hw/pxa2xx.c
> index d966846..68b67ae 100644
> --- a/hw/pxa2xx.c
> +++ b/hw/pxa2xx.c
> @@ -1631,7 +1631,7 @@ static void pxa2xx_i2s_write(void *opaque, 
> target_phys_addr_t addr,
>          }
>          if (value & (1 << 4))                                /* EFWR */
>              printf("%s: Attempt to use special function\n", __FUNCTION__);
> -        s->enable = ((value ^ 4) & 5) == 5;          /* ENB && !RST*/
> +        s->enable = ((value ^ (1 << 3)) & 9) == 9;           /* ENB && !RST*/
>          pxa2xx_i2s_update(s);
>          break;
>      case SACR1:

The fix looks fine, but the resulting code is probably over
engineered... What about:

         s->enable = (value & 9) == 1;

?

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
address@hidden                 http://www.aurel32.net



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]