[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call minutes for Feb 1
From: |
Christoph Hellwig |
Subject: |
[Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call minutes for Feb 1 |
Date: |
Tue, 1 Feb 2011 12:53:36 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 05:36:13PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> kvm_cpu_exec/kvm_run, and start wondering "What needs to be done to
> upstream so that qemu-kvm could use that implementation?". If they
> differ, the reasons need to be understood and patched away, either by
> fixing/enhancing upstream or simplifying qemu-kvm. Once the upstream
> changes are merged back, a qemu-kvm patch is posted to switch to that
> version.
while I'm not an expert in that area I really like you're approach. I'd
really prefer to let you finish up all the major work that way before
starting massive revamping like the glib main loop. Resolving the
qemu/qemu-kvm schisma surely is more important for the overall project
than rewriting existing functionality to look a little nicer.
- [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes for Feb 1, Chris Wright, 2011/02/01
- [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call minutes for Feb 1, Jan Kiszka, 2011/02/01
- [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call minutes for Feb 1, Anthony Liguori, 2011/02/01
- [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call minutes for Feb 1, Jan Kiszka, 2011/02/01
- [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call minutes for Feb 1, Anthony Liguori, 2011/02/01
- [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call minutes for Feb 1, Jan Kiszka, 2011/02/01
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call minutes for Feb 1, Anthony Liguori, 2011/02/01
- [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call minutes for Feb 1, Marcelo Tosatti, 2011/02/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call minutes for Feb 1, Anthony Liguori, 2011/02/03
[Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call minutes for Feb 1,
Christoph Hellwig <=