|
From: | Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: | [Qemu-devel] Re: [0.14] Queue of 0.14 patches/pull? |
Date: | Fri, 28 Jan 2011 14:33:36 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.7 |
On 01/28/2011 11:00 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
28.01.2011 11:06, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: []I would like Kemari to be included for 0.14. Thanks to many valuable comments from various reviewers, it got better than ever, I believe. For those who may object, it wouldn't affect any functions including live migration unless one turns it on. Besides, it is a good application of live migration. By having merged, I would be able to focus on increasing functionality and optimization.It's somewhat unexpected to see merge request for any new functionality into a "stable" branch. Having nothing bad against Kemari, I still think we shouldn't include any new functionality into 0.14, which were planned to be released before new year... ;) I mean, if it were not merged so far, for reasons that can be discussed separately etc, regardless of its good shape and so on... let's don't do any last-minute merges.
To be fair to Yoshiaki, the first 17 patches in his 19-patch series have no impact on the operation of QEMU, and even the last two are Kemari-only. I know almost nothing about Kemari so I cannot comment on the technical side of those patches, only that it w^Hshouldn't be destabilizing. I made some comments on a couple of patches, so I'm inclined to say no as well.
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/91096 should be applied in any case, as it is a regression from 0.12.
Paolo
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |