qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] scsi-disk: add data direction checking


From: Stefan Hajnoczi
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] scsi-disk: add data direction checking
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 10:20:56 +0000

On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Hannes Reinecke <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 11/23/2010 11:03 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Hannes Reinecke <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> @@ -172,6 +170,9 @@ static void scsi_read_data(SCSIRequest *req)
>>>     /* No data transfer may already be in progress */
>>>     assert(r->req.aiocb == NULL);
>>>
>>> +    if (r->req.cmd.mode == SCSI_XFER_TO_DEV)
>>> +        BADF("Data transfer direction invalid\n");
>>> +
>>>     if (r->sector_count == (uint32_t)-1) {
>>>         DPRINTF("Read buf_len=%zd\n", r->iov[0].iov_len);
>>>         r->sector_count = 0;
>>> @@ -284,6 +285,9 @@ static int scsi_write_data(SCSIRequest *req)
>>>     /* No data transfer may already be in progress */
>>>     assert(r->req.aiocb == NULL);
>>>
>>> +    if (r->req.cmd.mode != SCSI_XFER_TO_DEV)
>>> +        BADF("Data transfer direction invalid\n");
>>> +
>>>     n = iov_size(r->iov, r->iov_num) / 512;
>>>     if (n) {
>>>         qemu_iovec_init_external(&r->qiov, r->iov, r->iov_num);
>>
>> If the guest can trigger this then there must be a SCSI response (an
>> error?).  Right now BADF() will do fprintf(stderr) and then continue
>> executing.
>>
>> Can we abort the operation?
>>
> I've done a patch for it as per suggestion by hch.
> Right now we have
>
>    if (r->req.cmd.mode == SCSI_XFER_TO_DEV) {
>        DPRINTF("Data transfer direction invalid\n");
>        scsi_read_complete(r, -EINVAL);
>        return;
>    }
>
> and -EINVAL will return the sense code 'INVALID FIELD IN CDB'.
> Will be in the next patchset.

Sounds good.

Stefan



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]