qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/2] Re: [PATCH v9 5/8] pcie/aer: helper functio


From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/2] Re: [PATCH v9 5/8] pcie/aer: helper functions for pcie aer capability
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 10:52:38 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 05:11:17PM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 04:06:38PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 05:26:09PM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> > > This patch implements helper functions for pcie aer capability
> > > which will be used later.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <address@hidden>
> > 
> > OK, I applied this and tried to get rid of recursion,
> > and clean up some whitespace and english mistakes.
> > 
> > Patcheset attached, pls review.
> > 
> > I'll push the patches out on pci branch so we can
> > make progress more easily.
> 
> Thank you for cleaning it up.
> Basically looks good. Except the following patch.

Right. Fixed up, thanks!

> 
> > Please, try to address the TODO: I think the case of
> > PCIE device behind a pci bridge is not covered properly.
> 
> Will do.
> 
> 
> >From 166886f7f3e423812f4f3f467e2071c53e9dde01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> Message-Id: <address@hidden>
> In-Reply-To: <address@hidden>
> References: <address@hidden>
> From: Isaku Yamahata <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 17:03:23 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] pcie/aer: typo
> 
> Compilation fix.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/pcie_aer.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/pcie_aer.c b/hw/pcie_aer.c
> index 03cc6fb..c72cbc6 100644
> --- a/hw/pcie_aer.c
> +++ b/hw/pcie_aer.c
> @@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ static void pcie_aer_msg(PCIDevice *dev, const PCIEAERMsg 
> *msg)
>      uint8_t type;
>  
>      while (dev) {
> -        if (!pci_is_express(parent_port)) {
> +        if (!pci_is_express(dev)) {
>              /* just ignore it */
>              /* TODO: Shouldn't we set PCI_STATUS_SIG_SYSTEM_ERROR?
>               * Consider e.g. a PCI bridge above a PCI Express device. */
> -- 
> 1.7.1.1
> 
> 
> -- 
> yamahata



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]