[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v7 2/6] pcie/aer: helper functions for pcie aer
From: |
Isaku Yamahata |
Subject: |
[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v7 2/6] pcie/aer: helper functions for pcie aer capability |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Nov 2010 10:24:30 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) |
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 02:57:12PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > +static void pcie_aer_clear_error(PCIDevice *dev);
> > +static void pcie_aer_msg(PCIDevice *dev, const PCIEAERMsg *msg);
> > +
>
> so what exactly is the order of calls that makes
> removing the forward declarations impractical?
> Is there a recursive call? If yes I'd like to
> see it documented much better.
Why do you think forward declaration is so bad?
I don't see any such consensus and I don't think they aren't
accused generally like goto.
Can you please elaborate why you're trying so hard to prevent it?
--
yamahata
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 1/6] pcie_regs.h: more constants, Isaku Yamahata, 2010/11/02
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 3/6] pcie/aer: glue aer error injection into qemu monitor, Isaku Yamahata, 2010/11/02
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 5/6] x3130/upstream: support aer, Isaku Yamahata, 2010/11/02
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 6/6] x3130/downstream: support aer., Isaku Yamahata, 2010/11/02
[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v7 0/6] pcie port switch emulators, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2010/11/02