[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: "Bad ram offset"?
From: |
Blue Swirl |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: "Bad ram offset"? |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Sep 2010 20:24:19 +0000 |
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Andreas Färber <address@hidden> wrote:
> Am 28.09.2010 um 21:31 schrieb Artyom Tarasenko:
>
>> 2010/9/28 Blue Swirl <address@hidden>:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Artyom Tarasenko
>>> <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> In today's git master:
>>>>
>>>> $ ./qemu-system-sparc64 -M sun4u -m 2048
>>>> Bad ram offset ffffffff80000000
>>>
>>> Smells like unwanted sign extension somewhere.
>>
>> fwiw, tested -m 2048 with i386 and x86-64 and they both are fine with
>> it. So it must be something platform-specific.
>
> Same behavior on ppc host fwiw.
The attached patch should fix this.
0001-sysbus-fix-address-truncation.patch
Description: application/mbox
- [Qemu-devel] "Bad ram offset"?, Artyom Tarasenko, 2010/09/27
- [Qemu-devel] Re: "Bad ram offset"?, Blue Swirl, 2010/09/28
- [Qemu-devel] Re: "Bad ram offset"?, Artyom Tarasenko, 2010/09/28
- [Qemu-devel] Re: "Bad ram offset"?, Blue Swirl, 2010/09/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: "Bad ram offset"?, Andreas Färber, 2010/09/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: "Bad ram offset"?,
Blue Swirl <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: "Bad ram offset"?, Andreas Färber, 2010/09/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: "Bad ram offset"?, Blue Swirl, 2010/09/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: "Bad ram offset"?, Artyom Tarasenko, 2010/09/30