[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-devel] Re: Problem with virtio
From: |
Frans de Boer |
Subject: |
[Qemu-devel] Re: Problem with virtio |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:02:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100714 SUSE/3.0.6 Thunderbird/3.0.6 |
On 09/26/2010 05:30 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 01:15:22AM +0200, Frans de Boer wrote:
>
>> On 09/20/2010 11:19 PM, Vadim Rozenfeld wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 22:22 +0200, Frans de Boer wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 09/20/2010 07:46 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 11:13:16PM +0200, Frans de Boer wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 09/19/2010 05:53 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:13:12PM +0200, Frans de Boer wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 09/17/2010 10:10 AM, Frans de Boer wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 09/17/2010 01:40 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 23:49:51 +0200
>>>>>> Frans de Boer <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear reader,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Using qemu-kvm-0.13-rc1 and having the boot
>>>>>> partition as if=virtio,
>>>>>> causes the attached blue screen when booting Windows
>>>>>> XP SP3.
>>>>>> Changing the interface to ide (if=ide) and the
>>>>>> system boots normal.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you have the virtio drivers installed?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, everything is working fine when I use the 0.12.5
>>>>>> release.
>>>>>> Before you ask, I am using the git repository too. Same
>>>>>> effect.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No suggestions form anyone?
>>>>>> Again, any compile combination is working under 0.12.5. Starting
>>>>>> with
>>>>>> 0.13-rc0/1 the virtio option for the boot disk is not working
>>>>>> anymore.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Frans.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Could you try bisecting please?
>>>>>> git bisect start v0.13.0-rc0 v0.12.0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> will start the bisect process, then you build, test and run
>>>>>> git bisect good/git bisect bad as appropriate to get the
>>>>>> new version.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Following your advice, I noticed that the system could not boot when I
>>>>>> use the
>>>>>> guest virtio driver. I then switch back to as far as version 10.0 with
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> same bad result. I then remembered that in the past I used the '.raw'
>>>>>> format.
>>>>>> Since I am using the qcow2 format (better performance), I never tried
>>>>>> if=virtio
>>>>>> for the disk before until I use the 0.13.0-rc1 version. I tried the
>>>>>> release tar
>>>>>> file of 0.12.5 and this time with the guest virtio driver, with the same
>>>>>> bad
>>>>>> result.
>>>>>> Maybe it is the file format? Maybe the virtio disk driver? I have taken
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> virtio drivers from the KVM website.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> Please try this one
>>> http://people.redhat.com/vrozenfe/VioStorXp32.tar.gz
>>> Cheers,
>>> Vadim.
>>>
>>>
>>>>>> Frans.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> I got confused, sorry. Let's try to enumerate what works and what does
>>>>> not.
>>>>> Could you tell us which of the following combinations you tried
>>>>> and with what result (works/doesn't)?
>>>>>
>>>>> - virtio + raw + 0.12
>>>>> - virtio + qcow2 + 0.12
>>>>> - ide + qcow2 + 0.12
>>>>>
>>>>> - virtio + raw + 0.13
>>>>> - virtio + qcow2 + 0.13
>>>>> - ide + qcow2 + 0.13
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I used 0.12.5 (git and tarball) and the 0.13-rc1 (git and tarball)
>>>>
>>>> - virtio + raw + 0.12 ok
>>>> - virtio + qcow2 + 0.12 fail!
>>>> - ide + qcow2 + 0.12 ok
>>>>
>>>> - virtio + raw + 0.13 fail!
>>>> - virtio + qcow2 + 0.13 fail!
>>>> - ide + qcow2 + 0.13 ok
>>>>
>>>> Frans.
>>>>
>>>>
>> The new list is:
>>
>> - virtio + raw + 0.13 ok.
>>
>> That is when I am using this viostor driver:
>> http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/virtio-win/latest/images/bin/
>> I used the complete ISO file and extracted the viostor files. These are 6.x
>> files.
>>
>> .qcow2 with virtio still does not work under 0.13-rc1
>> It's late, so maybe in a few days I try 0.12.5 with the .qcow2 format.
>>
> OK, so with new drivers all formats behave identically
> under 0.13 and 0.12, right?
>
>
Yes, a image format in qcow2 is not working under versions 0.12-0.13
while using the latest - or previous - virtio drivers.
The question is now if that is only in my case (and if so what "special"
environment do I have) or are there others having the same issue. Which
points to a design issue in either the qcow2 format or the virtio drivers.
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Problem with virtio, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Problem with virtio, Frans de Boer, 2010/09/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Problem with virtio, Frans de Boer, 2010/09/18
- [Qemu-devel] Re: Problem with virtio, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2010/09/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Problem with virtio, Frans de Boer, 2010/09/19
- [Qemu-devel] Re: Re: Problem with virtio, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2010/09/20
- [Qemu-devel] Re: Problem with virtio, Frans de Boer, 2010/09/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Problem with virtio, Vadim Rozenfeld, 2010/09/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Problem with virtio, Frans de Boer, 2010/09/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Problem with virtio, Frans de Boer, 2010/09/25
- [Qemu-devel] Re: Re: Problem with virtio, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2010/09/26
- [Qemu-devel] Re: Problem with virtio,
Frans de Boer <=