qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes for Sept 21


From: Chris Wright
Subject: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes for Sept 21
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:05:06 -0700
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10)

Nested VMX
- looking for forward progress and better collaboration between the
  Intel and IBM teams
- needs more review (not a new issue)
- use cases
- work todo
  - merge baseline patch
    - looks pretty good
    - review is finding mostly small things at this point
    - need some correctness verification (both review from Intel and testing)
  - need a test suite
    - test suite harness will help here
      - a few dozen nested SVM tests are there, can follow for nested VMX
  - nested EPT
  - optimize (reduce vmreads and vmwrites)
- has long term maintan

Hotplug
- command...guest may or may not respond
- guest can't be trusted to be direct part of request/response loop
- solve at QMP level
- human monitor issues (multiple successive commands to complete a
  single unplug)
  - should be a GUI interface design decision, human monitor is not a
    good design point
    - digression into GUI interface

Drive caching
- need to formalize the meanings in terms of data integrity guarantees
- guest write cache (does it directly reflect the host write cache?)
  - live migration, underlying block dev changes, so need to decouple the two
- O_DIRECT + O_DSYNC
  - O_DSYNC needed based on whether disk cache is available
  - also issues with sparse files (e.g. O_DIRECT to unallocated extent)
  - how to manage w/out needing to flush every write, slow
- perhaps start with O_DIRECT on raw, non-sparse files only?
- backend needs to open backing store matching to guests disk cache state
- O_DIRECT itself has inconsistent integrity guarantees
  - works well with fully allocated file, depedent on disk cache disable
    (or fs specific flushing)
- filesystem specific warnings (ext4 w/ barriers on, brtfs)
- need to be able to open w/ O_DSYNC depending on guets's write cache mode
- make write cache visible to guest (need a knob for this)
- qemu default is cache=writethrough, do we need to revisit that?
- just present user with option whether or not to use host page cache
- allow guest OS to choose disk write cache setting
  - set up host backend accordingly
- be nice preserve write cache settings over boot (outgrowing cmos storage)
- maybe some host fs-level optimization possible
  - e.g. O_DSYNC to allocated O_DIRECT extent becomes no-op
- conclusion
  - one direct user tunable, "use host page cache or not"
  - one guest OS tunable, "enable disk cache"



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]