qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] lsi_scsi assertion


From: Peter Lieven
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] lsi_scsi assertion
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 14:51:34 +0200

Am 17.09.2010 um 14:38 schrieb Jan Kiszka:

> Am 17.09.2010 14:31, Peter Lieven wrote:
>> 
>> Am 17.09.2010 um 14:30 schrieb Jan Kiszka:
>> 
>>> Am 17.09.2010 14:26, Peter Lieven wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Am 17.09.2010 um 13:36 schrieb Bernhard Kohl:
>>>> 
>>>>> Am 16.09.2010 15:57, schrieb ext Peter Lieven:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I found the following assertion in my log files after a system reset was 
>>>>>> executed
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> kvm: lsi_scsi: error: ORDERED queue not implemented
>>>>>> last message repeated 5 times
>>>>>> kvm: lsi_scsi: error: Unimplemented message 0x0d
>>>>>> kvm: lsi_scsi: error: Unimplemented message 0x0c
>>>>>> kvm: lsi_scsi: error: Unimplemented message 0x0d
>>>>>> kvm: qemu-kvm-0.12.4.1: /usr/src/qemu-kvm-0.12.4/hw/lsi53c895a.c:596: 
>>>>>> lsi_reselect: Assertion `s->current == ((void *)0)' failed.
>>>>>> kvm: Aborted
>>>>>> kvm errno=134
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The guest is a 64-bit ubuntu 10.04 server. Qemu-KVM is 0.12.4.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Sounds this familiar to anyone?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> BR,
>>>>>> Peter
>>>>> 
>>>>> For messages 0x0c and 0x0d I recently submitted a patch:
>>>>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/79660
>>>> 
>>>> thanks.
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ORDERED queue is still missing.
>>>>> The assertion needs to be investigated. What guest OS?
>>>> 
>>>> ubuntu 10.04.1 lts 64-bit
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Already checked if even the abort persists with 0.13-rc1? Just to
>>> exclude that this is only a missing back-port.
>> 
>> hi, not yet. i have not tried 0.13-rc1 because i did not find a valid 
>> changelog in the distro.
> 
> You mean you did not find any potentially related commit in git? There
> were definitely changes regarding reset, and I don't think we have them
> in 0.12 yet (backport was non-trivial, /me would have to check our local
> patches for 0.12 if those turns out to be the key for your abort).

sorry, my sentence was not clear.

i downloaded 0.13-rc1 tarball from sourceforge and there are no entries 
regarding
0.13-rc1 in the changelog.

br,
peter


> 
> Jan
> 
> -- 
> Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
> Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]