Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call minutes for June 15

[Aurelien Jarno]

On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:41:53AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 08:18:12AM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> > KVM/qemu patches
> > - patch rate is high, documentation is low, review is low
> > - patches need to include better descriptions and documentation
> >   - will slow down patch writers
> >   - will make it easier for patch reviewers
> 
> What is the qemu patch review policy anyway?  There are no
> "Reviewed-by:" included in the actual commits, and the requirement
> for a positive review also seem to vary a lot, up to the point that
> some commiters commit code that has never hit a public mailing list
> before.
> 

This is indeed something very useful that should be encouraged.
Depending on the patch and the persons that have reviewed/acked it, I
commit some patches only after a very quick look.

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
address@hidden                 http://www.aurel32.net