qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] Suggested Parameters for SLES 10 64-bit


From: Peter Lieven
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Suggested Parameters for SLES 10 64-bit
Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 11:40:21 +0200

Am 18.05.2010 um 15:51 schrieb Alexander Graf:

> Peter Lieven wrote:
>> Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> Peter Lieven wrote:
>>> 
>>>> we are running on intel xeons here:
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> That might be the reason. Does it break when passing -no-kvm?
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> processor    : 0
>>>> vendor_id    : GenuineIntel
>>>> cpu family    : 6
>>>> model        : 26
>>>> model name    : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           L5530  @ 2.40GHz
>>>> stepping    : 5
>>>> cpu MHz        : 2394.403
>>>> cache size    : 8192 KB
>>>> physical id    : 1
>>>> siblings    : 4
>>>> core id        : 0
>>>> cpu cores    : 4
>>>> apicid        : 16
>>>> initial apicid    : 16
>>>> fpu        : yes
>>>> fpu_exception    : yes
>>>> cpuid level    : 11
>>>> wp        : yes
>>>> flags        : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge
>>>> mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe
>>>> syscall rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good
>>>> xtopology tsc_reliable nonstop_tsc pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx est
>>>> tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm dca sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt lahf_lm tpr_shadow
>>>> vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
>>>> bogomips    : 4788.80
>>>> clflush size    : 64
>>>> cache_alignment    : 64
>>>> address sizes    : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
>>>> power management:
>>>> 
>>>> kvm-kmod is 2.6.32.7
>>>> ...
>>>> 
>>>> which commandline parameters do you supply to qemu-kvm?
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> None :)
>>> 
>> It seems to stop working if i supply -no-kvm-irqchip. Can you try to
>> reproduce this?
>> 
>> We introduced that parameter because we encountered some problems with
>> the e1000 kernel driver stopped to work in some
>> guests after live migration with a "nobody cared about interupt" (i
>> don't know the exact error anymore). supplying
>> -no-kvm-irqchip made live migration of these guests possible...
>> Sounds that familiar to someone?
> 
> So it works with the in-kernel irqchip? That's the normally supported
> configuration anyways. If migration fails with that, that's a different
> thing and definitely needs to be addressed.

I got the error reproduced in ubuntu 9.10 server 64-bit and Suse Linux 10.1. I 
will 
file a seperate report.

Peter

> 
> Alex
> 
> 
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]