[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] target-sparc: Simplify ICC generation; fix
From: |
Artyom Tarasenko |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] target-sparc: Simplify ICC generation; fix ADDX carry generation. |
Date: |
Wed, 12 May 2010 17:18:18 +0200 |
2010/5/12 Richard Henderson <address@hidden>:
> On 05/11/2010 02:31 PM, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
>> Nack. It looks like you reverted carry generation to the previous
>> (broken) behavior.
>
> Oh? I suppose I should go back and look at the logs, but the way
> it's written there sure seems to match 5.1.5.1 of the sparcv9 manual:
> You'll only get carry into the high bit on X - Y if X < Y.
>
> In any case, if you meant to fix carry computation for subtraction,
> you missed changing the 64-bit carry computation too.
May very well be the case. I cared only about sparcv8. Was sort of
expecting that someone would stop me telling I broke v9...
> It is still
> written the same way before and after my patch, and matches both
> the expectation I have from the v9 manual and the post-patch code
> along the 32-bit path.
Probably v9 differs from v8?
> Perhaps you could point out the change I'm reverting? I don't
> see any change to the actual computation of the flags since
> f0f26a06d51b7e7764f8951cdbf67ac9ad507f6d, last year.
It is last year, but
3e6ba503400c34cbe0f9ad6e289921688bf303a3
--
Regards,
Artyom Tarasenko
solaris/sparc under qemu blog: http://tyom.blogspot.com/
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] target-sparc: Fix compilation with --enable-debug., Richard Henderson, 2010/05/10
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] target-sparc: Inline some generation of carry for ADDX/SUBX., Richard Henderson, 2010/05/10
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Fix ADDX compilation plus improvements, v2, Richard Henderson, 2010/05/12