|
From: | Avi Kivity |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [libvirt] Libvirt debug API |
Date: | Sun, 25 Apr 2010 17:50:52 +0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100330 Fedora/3.0.4-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.4 |
On 04/23/2010 09:33 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
This is a different ambiguity, about the semantic results of the commands,where as I'm refering to the execution order. If I look at a libvirt logfile and see a set of JSON commands logged, I want to know that this ordering from the logs, was indeed the same as order in which qemu processed them. If you have two separate monitor connection you can't be sure of the order of execution. It is key for our bug troubleshooting that given a libvirt log file, we can replay the JSON commands again and get the same results. Twomonitor connections is just increasing complexity of code without any tangible benefit.I think you're assuming direct access to the second monitor? I'm not suggesting that. I'm suggesting that libvirt is still the one submitting commands to the second monitor and that it submits those commands in lock step.
What about protocol extensions? For instance, pretend libvirt doesn't support async messages, what would it do when it receives one from the user's monitor?
-- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |