|
From: | Anthony Liguori |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] Address translation - virt->phys->ram |
Date: | Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:21:03 -0600 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091209 Fedora/3.0-4.fc12 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0 |
On 02/22/2010 11:47 AM, Ian Molton wrote:
Anthony Liguori wrote:On 02/22/2010 10:46 AM, Ian Molton wrote:Anthony Liguori wrote:cpu_physical_memory_map(). But this function has some subtle characteristics. It may return a bounce buffer if you attempt to map MMIO memory. There is a limited pool of bounce buffers available so it may return NULL in the event that it cannot allocate a bounce buffer. It may also return a partial result if you're attempting to map a region that straddles multiple memory slots.Thanks. I had found this, but was unsure as to wether it was quite what I wanted. (also is it possible to tell when it has (eg.) allocated a bounce buffer?) Basically, I need to get buffer(s) from guest userspace into the hosts address space. The buffers are virtually contiguous but likely physically discontiguous. They are allocated with malloc() and theres nothing I can do about that. The obvious but slow solution would be to copy all the buffers into nice virtio-based scatter/gather buffers and feed them to the host that way, however its not fast enough.Why is this slow?Because the buffers will all have to be copied.
Why?It sounds like your kernel driver is doing the wrong thing if you can't preserve zero-copy from userspace.
So far, switching from abusing an instruction to interrupt qemu to using virtio has incurred a roughly 5x slowdown.
If you post patches, we can help determine what you're doing that's causing such a slow down.
Regards, Anthony Liguori
I'd guess much of this is down to the fact we have to switch to kernel-mode on the guest and back again for every single GL call... If I can establish some kind of stable guest_virt->phys->host_virt mapping, many of the problems will just 'go away'. a way to interrupt qemu from user-mode on the guest without involving the guest kernel would be quite awesome also (theres really nothing we want the kernel to actually /do/ here, it just adds overhead). -Ian
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |