[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Feb 9
From: |
Avi Kivity |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Feb 9 |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:32:22 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100120 Fedora/3.0.1-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.1 |
On 02/09/2010 05:08 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
I'm not saying we should push hpet into the kernel to save userspace
coding effort; there should be an independent reason to do this. But
I don't think threading qemu is going to be anything near easy.
It's certainly not easy but I don't think it's impossibly hard.
Not impossible - see for example the kernel, the BKL should be removed RSN.
But yes, I think RCU will simplify things for us, and we have all of
that experience to learn from.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
[Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Feb 9, Anthony Liguori, 2010/02/09
[Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Feb 9, Avi Kivity, 2010/02/09