qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/9] sparc64: interrupts and tick timers v1


From: Blue Swirl
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/9] sparc64: interrupts and tick timers v1
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 18:16:25 +0000

Thanks, applied all except 9/9.

On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Igor V. Kovalenko
<address@hidden> wrote:
> The following series is a cleanup over previous one.
>
> v0 -> v1: post-review changes
> - dropped patch "clear exception_index with -1 val" (applied)
> - new patch "change_pstate should have 32bit argument"
> - cleanups for coding style and hexadecimal output convention
> - wrpil is no-op for CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> - restored PIL 15 as non-maskable interrupt level on sparcv8
> - check for PSTATE.IE is replaced with call to cpu_interrupts_enabled()
> - in patch "sparc64: interrupt trap handling"
>  cleaned up change in cpu_exec; since sparc64 does not use
>  CPU_INTERRUPT_TIMER now, corresponding code branch is unchanged
>
> ---
>
> Igor V. Kovalenko (9):
>      sparc64: change_pstate should have 32bit argument
>      sparc64: trace pstate and global register set changes
>      sparc64: add PIL to cpu state dump
>      sparc64: use helper_wrpil to check pending irq on write
>      sparc64: check for pending irq when pil, pstate or softint is changed
>      sparc64: add macros to deal with softint and timer interrupt
>      sparc64: move cpu_interrupts_enabled to cpu.h
>      sparc64: interrupt trap handling
>      sparc64: reimplement tick timers
>
>
>  cpu-exec.c               |   28 +++---
>  hw/sun4u.c               |  225 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  target-sparc/cpu.h       |   27 ++++++
>  target-sparc/exec.h      |   13 ---
>  target-sparc/helper.c    |    1
>  target-sparc/helper.h    |    1
>  target-sparc/op_helper.c |   81 +++++++++++++++--
>  target-sparc/translate.c |    5 -
>  8 files changed, 300 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)
>
> --
> Kind regards,
> Igor V. Kovalenko
>
>
>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]